Open AWE Magazine menu
Subscribe Login

Home / Articles and Press Releases / Article / Drug Residues in Water

CATEGORIES

  • Latest Issue
  • Air Quality
  • Chromatography
  • Construction
  • Climate Change
  • Emissions
  • Environmental & Monitoring Technology
  • Gas Detection
  • Health and Safety Awareness
  • Humidity & Temperature
  • Laboratory Testing
  • Land Remediation
  • Marine Pollution
  • Noise Monitoring
  • Regulations & Legislations
  • Sludge and Biosolids
  • Soil Analysis
  • Spectroscopy
  • Weather Monitoring
  • Water Analysis
  • Water Monitoring

MORE

  • Press Releases
  • Events
  • Videos
  • Magazines

COMPANY

  • About
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
HSI White logo
Open AWE Magazine menu
Subscribe

Home / Articles and Press Releases / Article / Drug Residues in Water

CATEGORIES

  • Latest Issue
  • Air Quality
  • Chromatography
  • Construction
  • Climate Change
  • Emissions
  • Environmental & Monitoring Technology
  • Gas Detection
  • Health and Safety Awareness
  • Humidity & Temperature
  • Laboratory Testing
  • Land Remediation
  • Marine Pollution
  • Noise Monitoring
  • Regulations & Legislations
  • Sludge and Biosolids
  • Soil Analysis
  • Spectroscopy
  • Weather Monitoring
  • Water Analysis
  • Water Monitoring

MORE

  • Press Releases
  • Events
  • Videos
  • Magazines

COMPANY

  • About
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Contact

CATEGORIES

  • Heat and Flame
  • Press Release|Gas Detection
  • Article
  • Press Release
  • Air Quality
  • Chromatography
  • Construction
  • Climate Change
  • Emissions
  • Environmental & Monitoring Technology
  • Gas Detection
  • Health and Safety Awareness
  • Humidity & Temperature
  • Laboratory Testing
  • Land Remediation
  • Marine Pollution
  • Noise Monitoring
  • Personal Protective Equipment
  • Regulations & Legislations
  • Sludge and Biosolids
  • Soil Analysis
  • Spectroscopy
  • Weather Monitoring
  • Water Analysis
  • Water Monitoring
  • Wellbeing at work

Article

Drug Residues in Water

By Eric Ziegler, Abdelkader Boubetra, Anne Tirard

| Read Bio

Published: October 07th, 2021

Share this article

Thanks to improvements in analytical chemistry, the presence of drug residues, as well as their derivatives or metabolites, have been widely established on a global scale, particularly in surface and ground water, wastewater, and in sludge. Such molecules are now found in lists monitoring health risks and environmental quality.

Drug residues have become an important class of molecules in the monitoring of water quality. Despite this, (drugs) analyses are currently not as developed as the ones of pesticides, PAHs or PCBs. As a result, in 2018 BIPEA decided to launch a dedicated proficiency testing scheme (PTS) for drug residues. In order to be able to meet the needs of most of the laboratories, it was decided to start from the beginning with a wide range of molecules. Since 2018, a proficiency test with two series of samples spiked with about 70 drug molecules is thus offered twice a year. The list includes the molecules found particularly in the ISO 21676 standard2, in the French XP T90-223 standard3 and in the approval for the French Ministry of Environment4. Both clean and, more recently, wastewater samples are introduced in these tests. Seven rounds have been organised so far which now allow for an overview to be drawn of the results and performance met in this PTS, especially regarding the number of results obtained for the different molecules; their related dispersion; the differences observed between clean and wastewater; as well as some information about recovery and stability.

Materials and Methods

Sample production and shipment

The most crucial aspect for the implementation of a proficiency-test programme is the production of homogeneous and stable samples.

For this PTS, a batch of selected water (clean water or wastewater) is homogenised in an adapted tank and distributed into one-litre brown glass bottles. Each bottle is then spiked individually with a solution containing all the selected drug molecules.

The homogeneity is checked through the analysis of a few molecules by a third-party laboratory. Ten samples from the manufactured series are analysed to determine the inter-sample standard deviation.

Drug Residues in Water

For each series, two one-litre bottles are provided to the participants in order to allow them to have enough volume to implement different analytical processes, if needed.

The parcel with the bottles is then shipped to all participants under refrigerated conditions, using cooling gels with a target temperature
of (4±3)°C.

Analyses by laboratories

Laboratories are invited to analyse these samples using the technique or method they prefer, for instance, either the standards mentioned above or through in-house methods.

Laboratories then submit their analysis results via electronic reply forms, in which they can also provide additional information about their method and the date of analysis.

Statistical treatments

The statistical treatments of the quantitative returned results are carried out in accordance with ISO 13528 standards5. The assigned values (xpt) are estimated from the robust mean of all the results, except incoherent values. The standard deviation for proficiency assessment (spt) is set to 30% of the assigned value. The use of such a determined value allows for an assessment to be had that is independent from the obtained results and consistent through time. This is especially useful when there are a limited number of results, which could lead to a wide and fluctuant dispersion of the results.

The quantitative results (x) could be evaluated and classified through z-scores, where

•   for z ≤ |2|, the result is considered satisfactory

•   for |2| < z < |3|, the result is considered questionable

•   for z ≥ |3|, the result is considered unsatisfactory

The interlaboratory comparison report is validated by both BIPEA and an external technical expert, and is then distributed to the participant.

Results and discussion

The first set of important data is the participation and number of results. Since the creation of this PTS, there are on average 18 registered participants, which is quite a good number already, showing an interest for this idea. However, none of the laboratories quantify all the offered molecules, and the number of results obtained is quite different from one molecule to another. The molecules are listed in Table 1 in descending order of average number of results provided on clean water (which includes tap water and surface water). Less results are provided on wastewater – two results less on average and four results less compared to the molecules with the most results on clean water. The top ten molecules analysed by the participants are: carbamazepine, paracetamol, ketoprofen, atenolol, sulfamethoxazole, diclofenac, sulfamethazine, ibuprofen, bezafibrate, and metronidazole.

Drug Residues in Water table 1

The second set of important data is the dispersion of results, provided as a Coefficient of Variation, CV%, (the robust standard deviation of the results/robust mean of the results, in per cent) as a standard to describe the precision of the results. As shown in the table below, with the molecules listed in ascending order of CV% in results obtained on clean water, 33 molecules (almost half), show an average CV% below 30% which is quite satisfactory for organic compounds at these levels, in the range [40-200 ng/l]. 12 other molecules have a CV% between 30% and 40% and 11 others have a CV% even higher. Finally, it was not possible to estimate any assigned values, and consequently to calculate any CV% for 14 molecules, either due to very dispersed or too little results. This data should consider the number of results provided, as the lower the number of results, the more the dispersion can be affected by just one or two results.

Drug Residues in Water table 2

The CV% met on wastewater are significantly higher, showing the difficulty faced with complex matrices. It is however, also related to a lower result quantity. Only eight molecules have a CV% lower than 30% on wastewater (ethynilestradiol, gemfibrozil, diclofenac, carbamazepine, bezafibrate, cyclophosphamide, 17-beta-estradiol and fenofibric acid) and 10 others have a CV% between 30% and 40% (cotinine, ofloxacine, diazepam, niflumic acid, clofibric acid, naproxen, ketoprofen, estrone roxithromycine and sotalol). It was not possible to estimate any assigned values for the further 30 molecules due to low result numbers. With exception to these issues related to result quantity, analytical issues are obviously faced for some molecules in wastewater regarding the diverse results sometimes obtained.

In addition to these means, it is possible for each molecule to plot the obtained CV% for each test against the concentration. This allows us to see if the performance is steady over the working range or if, on the contrary, it depends on the concentration. In the examples provided below, despite the limited number of rounds considered, the dispersion of the results expressed as CV% appears to increase slowly as concentration decreases for carbamazepine. Whereas for diclofenac, it is quite steady from 60 to 140 ng/l and then much higher for the two lower concentrations below 40 ng/l. This profile can indicate that these values are not very far above the limit of quantification of the participants.

Drug Residues in Water Dic graph

Finally, information can also be obtained for the spiking performed in the preparation of the samples. The consensus value obtained in the test can be compared with the theoretical spiking value. Looking at the 20 most searched molecules (see Table 1), the molecules can be classified for clean water in the following categories:

•   Molecules that are found always, or with a single exception, within +/- 20% of the theoretical spiking value: carbamazepine, paracetamol, ketoprofen, Ibuprofen, bezafibrate, metronidazole, oxazepam, norethindrone-19, naproxen, and cyclophosphamide.

•   Molecules that are overall well recovered, with the exception of some initial testing for which no addition of thiosulfate was used for tap water: atenolol, sulfamethoxazole, diclofenac, sulfamethazine, trimethoprim, estrone, propranolol.

•   Molecules with a clear systematic loss: metropolol.

•   Molecules which are often found more than spiked: caffeine and, in a lesser extent, diazepam. This could be due to some overestimations but, especially for caffeine, more likely due to the presence of the molecule in the matrix prior to spiking.

Other molecules can also be mentioned based on less results: ciprofloxacine, gabapentine, erythromycin and zolpidem. These are usually found to be significantly lower than the spiking value, which is most probably related to a stability issue in the applied conditions. Lopamidol cannot even be found at all.

Drug Residues in Water Car graph

Concerning the type of water, it can be noticed that two molecules seem to not be found at all or only at a very low level, specifically just in wastewater: progesterone and paracetamol. Most of the results are expressed as a limit of quantification, however, consensus values are then met in clean water.

On the other hand, several molecules can be found in wastewater at a much more concentrated level than the spiking value, more than 1 µg/l for example. In some cases, it is likely due to the initial content in wastewater, like it is regularly seen for diclofenac, oxazepam, sotalol, tramadol or gabapentine. In other cases, it becomes difficult to say as higher and lower concentrations are both given, and some identification issues can occur. It can happen for example, with carbamazepine.

Drug Residues in Water

“the monitoring of drug residues in water is expanding and reaching a larger scale”

As some participants do not find certain molecules, some information about the limits of quantification of the participants are obtained. These limits can vary a lot, according to the molecules and the laboratories, a quantification limit of 1 ng/l or 2 µg/l (2000 times more) can sometimes be given. Considering the spiking range of about 40-200 ng/l, < 50 ng/l or < 100 ng/l are the limits that are most met in tests for clean water. However, most of the participants are still able to quantify below 50 ng/l, 20 ng/l at least.

Conclusion

The monitoring of drug residues in water is expanding and reaching a larger scale. The development of a dedicated proficiency testing scheme on a wide range of compounds, allows the participants to control their performance for the analysis of the molecules they determine in routine, and give them the opportunity to test some others. Despite several results that remain limited in many cases, the study of these proficiency testing results provides valuable information about the current state of art. From these we can discern the molecules that are most searched; the performance that can be met according to the level of concentration and the type of water; as well as the molecules that are well recovered and those which are not. Therefore, the monitoring of drug residues in regulations should contribute to extend the needs of such analyses.

Drug Residues in Water

References

1   ISO/IEC 17025:2017 – General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

2   International standard: ISO/IEC 21676:2018 – Water quality – Determination of the dissolved fraction of selected active pharmaceutical ingredients, transformation products and other organic substances in water and treated wastewater – Method using high performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometric detection (HPLC-MS/MS or -HRMS) after direct injection.

3   French experimental standard: XP T90-223:2013 – Water quality – Determination of some drugs residues in the water-dissolved fraction – Method using solid phase extraction (SPE) and liquid chromatographic analysis with tandem mass spectrometric investigation (LC-MS/MS)

4   Approval of the French Ministry of Environment: www.labeau.ecologie.gouv.fr/

5   International standard: ISO 13528:2015 – Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons

Share this article

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Eric Ziegler, Abdelkader Boubetra, Anne Tirard

POPULAR POSTS BY Eric Ziegler, Abdelkader Boubetra, Anne Tirard

Article

Drug Residues in Water

Get email updates

Sign up for the AWE newsletter

Keep up-to-date through the power of email and receive the latest environmental monitoring product information and newsletter emails from AWE - Monitoring and Analysing the Impact of Industry on the Environment

"*" indicates required fields

Country
*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

FEATURED ARTICLES

Press Release

Blackline Safety and NevadaNano Reach Milestone in Deployment of Industry-First Sensors

Press Release

The Benefits of Using Refurbished Parts in Your Lab

Advertisement

SOCIAL MEDIA

AWE on Facebook

https://www.facebook.com/AWEIMagazine/

Advertisement

SOCIAL MEDIA

AWE on Twitter

Avatar AWE International Magazine @aweimagazine ·
25 Jan

Soil is a vital component of natural capital, hosting rich biodiversity and providing critical ecosystem services, such as food production, water purification and carbon storage.

Read more from the @EUEnvironment here:
https://www.aweimagazine.com/press-release/monitoring-soil-threats-in-europe/

#aweinternational #EEA #soil

Reply on Twitter 1618284319327543296 Retweet on Twitter 1618284319327543296 Like on Twitter 1618284319327543296 Twitter 1618284319327543296

Advertisement

SUBSCRIBE

Stay up to date with our newsletter

    • Keep up-to-date with Europe’s largest audited environmental monitoring magazine

 

    • Delivering the latest information on new products and emerging technologies related to industrial environmental monitoring.

 

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Subscribe

SUBSCRIBE TO AWE MAGAZINE

5 reasons to subscribe to our digital and print package

  • Stay up to date from anywhere in the world, with instant access to the latest issue straight from your phone, tablet or laptop.
  • Trust that you’re getting the best content from our range of internationally accredited authors.
  • Get full access to our archives and see how the environmental monitoring landscape has evolved with us over the years.
  • Enjoy our monthly newsletter curated with up-to-the-minute news and a selection of editor’s top picks.
  • Hot off the press and straight to your door – look forward to your own glossy copy of AWE, delivered five times a year
Subscribe View Subscription levels

STAY SAFE & INFORMED

Subscribe to the latest environmental monitoring articles, news, products and regulations

Find out more

Stay up to date with our newsletter

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

ABOUT

  • About AWE
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

YOUR ACCOUNT

Sign In Register Account Subscribe to AWE

RESOURCES

Request Media Pack

CONNECT

ACCREDITATIONS

Copyright Bay Publishing 2023. All Rights reserved.

Designed & Built by:
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT